We share a common goal to create something that is beneficial to our daily lives, providing convenience. We brainstormed about problems that we face in our daily lives and from there, we found problems that could possibly be improved upon. The most important criteria was the cost of the invention as we are targeting everyone. We wanted our invention to be affordable, as well as aesthetically appealing. The greatest challenge we face was not being able to find suitable materials. We overcame that by having a larger variety of materials to choose from. We met up usually to keep track of the progress, and stay on task. If our group had more time, we would have tried to introduce our invention to manufacturers, and ask for their comments or critics. We learn critical thinking and problem solving skills in this project that could be used in everyday life.
Magical Box
Thursday, August 18, 2011
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Group Discussion 8
The group met up to check on the progress of the project. Everything was going according to plan, with the final prototype done and completed, and the rest ongoing. We then tested out the product a few times for accuracy purpose, the experiment was relatively successful. We then start to make changes to the Semis’ powerpoint slides, updating it, to be the powerpoint slides for Finals. We then discussed about the aesthetics of our product.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Group Discussion 7
The group split up the work, with Jun Yang to do the product itself, Ronnie to do the inventor log, Sheng Pu to get the materials, and lastly Bryan to start on the web report.
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Group Discussion 6
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Group discussion 5
We met up, discussing about the problems that were raised during the Semis. Problems regarding materials, design, etc. We brainstormed and discussed the feasibility of all the ideas we came up with. We came up with crazy ideas, from using paper as materials, to using scotch- tapes. First meeting was not fruitful, so Jun Yang decided to call it a day, and all of us went home to think of inspiration and ideas.
Thursday, July 7, 2011
Reflections for Semis...
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Group Discussion 4
- Feasibility of material used
- Other possible suitable material
- Using of cardboard for the sides are quite hard and
tension of rubber is needed to pull it down. - Using of rubber to pull down the card board would cause the tissue to break
when being pulled due to too much tension.
- Use of paper instead of cardboard due to it being softer
- Taking away the rubber as it is not needed
because paper is soft enough to fall freely
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Saturday, April 9, 2011
Group Discussion 3
Friday, April 8, 2011
Group Discussion 2
- Problems of current model
- Ways to improve current model

- Exterior aesthetics quite ugly due to the falling of cloth
- Strength of rubber would break the tissue when being pulled out
- Difficulty in refilling the tissue
- Instead of using cloth, we propose to use a foldable cardboard
- Increase the length of the rubber band to lessen the tension
- Putting plastic to on the cover to make the pulling of tissue smoother
- Use an exterior cover instead
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Group Discussion 1
- Distribution of work
- Ideas on making the model

- Using of cloth for the exterior of the tissue box
- Using the card board for the cover and base of the tissue box
- Using rubber bands to pull the cover and base together
Monday, April 4, 2011
Brainstorming 3
Brainstorming 2
Brainstorming 1
whole family was eating happily with their fingers moving, trying to
break parts of the crab. However, they found out that taking tissue
paper out of the box was very tough as its halfway used, and when
Ronnie stick his hand in, he dirtied the whole box. He was frustrated
and the mood of the happy meal was destroyed.
Thus, Ronnie brought up this problem to the group during projects day
discussion and we all agreed to find a solution to this problem.


